Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Entredonneur
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. (aeropagitica) 23:24, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is apparently a neologism that didn't take. Its google hits are wiki references and this "Attainable Utopias" site (see Attainable-Utopias). Proposed deletion was removed by anon.
- Delete, not a widespread term. Gazpacho 05:00, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NEO. I hate anon deprodders. Alba 05:06, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as paleologism. --Kinu t/c 05:08, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as neologism. --Terence Ong 05:35, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nn WP:NEO WP:WINAD Esquizombi 07:05, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nnneologism. ProhibitOnions 11:19, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Do Not Delete, positive ramifications for introducing a word that we can associate with opportunity + altruism. User:Spellman
- No such user exists; comment was added by 158.223.1.117 (talk • contribs). Gazpacho 02:05, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as neo per nom. I'll live with the impact to society. Kuru talk 02:10, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete look up. Newyorktimescrossword 07:19, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Do Not Delete Just because it is not on google does not mean it is failing to catch on. This word facilitates better description when conversing about game theory. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.132.64.152 (talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.