Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Entity (film) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was return to incubator. —Darkwind (talk) 06:44, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Entity (film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was at AFD in February and the result was to incubate. Indeed the article incubator contains almost nothing but articles on not-yet-released films. So, I checked the link to the film's official website. Have a look for yourself. And on their official facebook page there are fans asking when this is coming out and getting no reply. And they apprently had a kickstarter campaign that was abruptly cancelled. Add that all up, and it looks pretty likely that this film has been cancelled. If by some chance it gets back on track in the future it can easily be restored, but for the moment this doesn't look like something we should have an article on, incubating or otherwise. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:14, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Send back to the incubator. While I can appreciate the nom returning this to mainspace in order to AFD it under WP:NFF, TOO SOON and lack of improvements while incubated rather than MFD'ing it... perhaps because HERE it will gain more eyes and input... the arguments at the previous AFD are still, if not more applicable. We have a film with an expected 2013 release date whose production has received coverage in reliable sources. If deleted, let it be without prejudice toward undeletion or recreation when it is finally released. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 03:40, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Return to incubator. If the space in there is a problem, I'm willing to userfy this myself. I've actually been keeping an eye on sourcing for this, so the lack of edits hasn't been for lack of eyes on it. If you can confirm that this has been cancelled then I have no true issue with it being completely deleted, but given the amount of coverage it's gotten I'm a little hesitant at outright deleting all of it. A post in the IMDb forums claims that they're delaying the release in order to improve the movie, ([1]) although I know the fallibility of anything on that site. I can't find the facebook page, but that doesn't necessarily mean anything. I'm not exactly skilled at finding the official pages of anything on there since there are so many groups and pages to weed through. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 17:46, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I messaged one of the film's directors and he directed me to the film's producers via the facebook page, as he said it's pretty much just in their hands now. According to the video on their YT account they're still working on it in some form or fashion, so there are plans to release it at an unspecified date. It's a little frustrating as this was a film I was actually looking forward to seeing, but all we can do now is incubate it or userfy it. Again, I'm willing to userfy it if that's a big concern as far as incubator space goes. (I know that it's frustrating to see a long list of articles that get little to no attention.) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:58, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.