Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enter (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Merging is a separate process which can be achieved through being bold orthrough discussion on the talk page. This article does not fail WP:MUSIC at all and has a lot of potential, as could be seen with even a cursory Google search. Fram (talk) 11:36, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Enter (album)

Delete nn album, consisting of little more than a trackist that could easily be incorporated into the article about the group, per WP:MUS Mayalld (talk) 13:31, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not notable.Russian Textiles (talk) 16:43, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Seems to be by a notable band on a notable label. There are tons of album pages like this, and consensus is that albums by notable acts usually warrant their own pages. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 21:49, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 23:25, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep - album sold very well according to the Within Temptation article. --T-rex 03:49, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Alblum articles are generally stubs, and the article is notable Yamakiri ^T_C § 07-2-2008 • 19:58:58 19:58, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.