Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Entefy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Biblioworm 19:24, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Entefy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable company--the third party sources are 1/ a local newspaper, which is not reliable for local companies, 2/ the promotional write up in Silicon Valley Business Journal--important as such journals go because of its location, but still primarily a source for promotion. 3/Directory entries in Crunchbase 4/a link to her patent. Promotional article with promotional wording, just like the one on the cofounder at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brienne Ghafourifar Note the wording: "meaningful insights""product vision" "on all your devices" DGG ( talk ) 22:30, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:36, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:40, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as searches found nothing better than the expected press releases and passing mentions, nothing for a better article at all. SwisterTwister talk 05:16, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:16, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:16, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The company is not notable and doesn't even have significant impact on the local market. Arashtitan talk 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Keep As mentioned in my comment under Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brienne, this company is regularly cited (locally and nationally) in media for the innovative work (as judged by current news against top competitors) as well as the world record set by one of the founders, Brienne in direct connection with the Company.Wheysted (talk) 04:05, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There are mentions of the company and its co-founder in that CNN piece and elsewhere in relation to the film She Started It, which does seem to me to be possibly more notable element. As for this company and Brienne, probably one article would have sufficed for the pair of them. Entefy may yet "tame the chaos of modern communication," a gag-worthy line that would still need to be cut if the article's kept. As for now, this may just be a question of WP:TOOSOON. If the company manages to garner some notability above and beyond being profiled in She Started It, then an article could be recreated. As for now, I agree with the nominator: delete. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:28, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment An article about She Started It would easily clear notability and then Entefy could be redirected or merged into that for the time being, until it gets its own notability. Sbwoodside (talk) 08:27, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Searches did not turn up enough to show they pass either WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:39, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.