Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enrique Munné

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 07:41, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Enrique Munné[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I PRODded this with this rationale: Fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG. Google hits are wikipedia mirrors, no results in my academic library. Brief namechecks in Spanish-language sources. es-wiki article exists but is nearly an orphan and has no inline references.

It was deprodded with the rationale "much longer Spanish article appears to have multiple sources". Appears, sure. But almost all of that list of sources is copied from item #4 on that list. (Find it here: [1]) It's clear that he existed and was an artist, but these aren't secondary sources we can write an article from.

Also, it's worth noting that the Spanish article was created by a user who has since been banned for creating poorly referenced articles and, worse, for randomly adding references to articles, where the reference has nothing to do with the text it's footnoting. (Diff: [2]. From the discussion: Lo cierto es que las ediciones de este usuario, sea adición de texto o supuesta referenciación, no son para nada fiables. Todo lo contrario. Reitero: todo lo contrario.) asilvering (talk) 04:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, Artists, Visual arts, and Argentina. asilvering (talk) 04:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Totally inadequate sourcing. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:41, 28 April 2022 (UTC).[reply]
Delete per above Oaktree b (talk) 13:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia in any langauge is not a reliable source. The above explantion is exactly why we should not blindly keep any article that has a Wikipedia article in another language.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Grnrchst (talk) 19:26, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - A WP:BEFORE search turns up a couple of name-checks that mention another artist who learned stain glass techniques from him. That is not enough to put him over the GNG or NARTIST bars. Netherzone (talk) 15:26, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.