Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enrique De La Caridad Angulo Borrero

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 19:02, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Enrique De La Caridad Angulo Borrero[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't see the notability. I can see that the article was trialled on the Sesotho Wikipedia before appearing here. Ingratis (talk) 18:45, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

* Keep.There is a lot of news and resources on the internet pages.If the poll is removed.More resources will be created.E B R A M (talk) 19:41, 14 August 2021 (UTC) E B R A M (talk) 19:44, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- If you can add more sources to the article, please do - it will help the discussion. I could not find much beyond what is already in the article. Ingratis (talk) 20:25, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no evidence of notability. A WP:BEFORE search shows a bunch of company profiles similar to this but nothing appears to meet either specific notability criteria or WP:GNG. Melcous (talk) 04:51, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:31, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:31, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cuba-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:32, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I too was unable to find anything that could be considered as significant coverage and the provided references, the ones that actually work, do nothing to establish notability at all. This is not the first time that we've seen this article here. It was submitted many times at draft and was eventually rejected due to failing notability guidelines; see User talk:Dr. Enrique De La Caridad Angulo Borrero Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:36, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:36, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

* Opinion :I am originally of Iranian descent and have no connection with this person. And I registered him on the Wikipedia page because of an order from a friend.E B R A M (talk) 13:47, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you explain what you mean by an 'order'? Why did your friend not write the article themselves? Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:46, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

>::Nothing. I just translated the text incorrectly. So I got it wrong, that's why I wrote it like this. I meant that a friend told me to create this person's page.E B R A M (talk) 19:50, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: There is no evidence of notability in the references. Page author removed the notability tag placed by this editor. --Whiteguru (talk) 22:35, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm seeing literally nothing from a news and books search; the article doesn't make any special claim about him having done anything notable, none of the references in the article pass muster as independent or reliable, and this discussion hasn't surfaced any evidence of more. jp×g 01:24, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Melcous, Spiderone. Fails GNG. – Broccoli & Coffee ^{(Oh hai)} 23:43, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as failing GNG. Alternatively, potentially qualifies for speedy delete G5 (though given the AfD was open for a week, might as well let it run).--Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 07:38, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Non notable Nitesh003 (talk) 13:02, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.