Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enrique De Jongh Caula

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nom withdrawn, no !votes to delete. (non-admin closure) Kj cheetham (talk) 19:58, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Enrique De Jongh Caula

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:GNG. – Ploni (talk) 20:54, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Architecture, Engineering, and Cuba. Ploni (talk) 20:54, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
His claim to notability would presumably be as a member of the Cuban Academy of Sciences, see the first ref, from their site. Criterion 3 of WP:PROF is "The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society)". But he isn't listed as one of the 252 current members. Johnbod (talk) 02:51, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw nomination: Figured it out—it seems he died a few years ago and the article wasn't updated ([1]). I'll go ahead and withdraw the nomination! –Ploni (talk) 03:38, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I did wonder about that. How many more living dead bios do we have I wonder - all those sports people! Johnbod (talk) 03:53, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.