Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enniscorthy RFC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) {{ping|ClydeFranklin}} (t/c) 16:08, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Enniscorthy RFC[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No encyclopedic references are used whatsoever, furthermore the notability and the importance of this article for the Sports category of the Wikipedia community is disputable. 多多123 (talk) 15:42, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Ireland. 多多123 (talk) 15:42, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. "No sources within the article" isn't a reason for deletion. "No reliable/verifiable/independent sources outside the article" is largely what matters. And, as part of a WP:BEFORE, I found and have added more than a few seemingly reliable/independent/verifiable refs. Guliolopez (talk) 17:58, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:30, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per work done by Guliolopez, which indicates a GNG pass. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 20:00, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Passes GNG after the additions by Guliolopez. --Bcp67 (talk) 21:35, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.