Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EnigmaWarsaw

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 20:55, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

EnigmaWarsaw

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been here since 2007, with no independent sources, and nothing to indicate what makes this game notable. In fact, there was a prod tag put on it not long after it was created, and the prod was removed with the amazing edit summary of "hopefully this will improve". Well, it hasn't. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 05:36, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no WP:RS as to why this is a notable game. --Kinu ^t/_c 06:02, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:00, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If someone wanted to this content could be merged to Warsaw, Poland, but there it would probably be UNDUE. I'm not seeing a really good reason to keep it. Jclemens (talk) 18:08, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: There is this, but someone would need to find an english version/translation per WP:NONENG. Nolelover 12:18, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:31, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and for God's sake do NOT merge to Warsaw! Marketing gimmick used by a travel agency we don't have an article on. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:10, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete'- Per above The Eskimo (talk) 15:41, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Non-notable. No reason to be merged. Joe Chill (talk) 22:01, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.