Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enid Lego Builder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:43, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Enid Lego Builder

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing significant coverage to satisfy WP:GNG or content that satisfies WP:ARTIST Dumelow (talk) 20:43, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Dumelow (talk) 20:43, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:16, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

delete seems to be alocal story about Carl Fielder, aka Enid Lego builder. Neither name returns significant coverage beyond local, which in this case seems to Oklahoma. There's a Tuulsa TV report, the same TV report played in Oklahoma City. Then there are a few local news reports, to go along with Facebook sourcing in the article. GNG fail. --- Possibly (talk) 05:33, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.