Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eniac Ventures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 00:16, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Eniac Ventures

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Eniac Ventures

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Eniac Ventures (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This company exists, but has not received enough significant coverage to merit a page on WP. All the coverage just mentions the company, but does not discuss it. Angryapathy (talk) 19:13, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, California, and New York. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:09, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:14, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:32, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

• Delete. The company raises funds and invests in various start-ups is about all I gleaned from the article despite its multitude of sources. Don't see how the WP:CORPDEPTH part of WP:NCORP is satisfied from brief mentions based on company press releases and interviews with the owners. Lack of analysis of the business. The essay WP:Wikipedia is not Crunchbase comes to mind in that the sources merely cover routine business transactions. Rupples (talk) 02:56, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.