Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English movement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If someone is actually willing to undertake the effort of finding other homes for some of this content they can contact me and request userfication. Beeblebrox (talk) 07:39, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

English movement

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

was nominated for speedy deletion, but fit into no speedy category. Some of group discussed are included in English nationalism; others would clearly not fit there. I wouldn't want to move it to English Reborn which I don't think is notable . Perhaps somebody can think of something positive to do, but I cannot. DGG ( talk ) 19:13, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete would be the positive move I think. The 'English movement' does not appear to be something widely covered by reliable sources, and the groups listed appear to be a largely unrelated collection of political groups, religious and folklore organisations and a few anti-Islamic hate groups. If any of the individual groups are notable they should have their own articles.--Michig (talk) 20:25, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this is a non-notable movement; no reliable sources appear in the article. If as fine a librarian as DGG can't find a source, it doesn't exist. Bearian (talk) 21:15, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no reliable refs Someone65 (talk) 17:22, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but Rename to Modern English nationalism; merge some of the material in English nationalism#Modern here and make this a "main" article for that section. This article reviews what may be called "Englishism" and usefully links together a variety of comparatively disparate topics, in a rather better way than a mere list article would. I know we deplore "modern" in titles, but this is a relatively recent phenomenon, reacting to Welsh and Scottish nationalist movements. Unfortunately, some of the groups belong to the loony right. I am not suggesting merge as that would unbalance English nationalism which does not look a bad article at a quick glance. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:26, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no reliable sources for the name, no evidence that the listed organisations would seem themselves as connected. An OR & synth minefield best deleted. No evidence that it is a a phenomenon, let alone a reaction to Welsh and Scottish nationalism. Any referenced material can go to English nationalism, that can split if it becomes overlong. --Snowded ^TALK 17:31, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete but merge some aspects of the article into other articles if and where relevant, whether they be religion / nationalism / folk articles. The movement does exist, though outside of the mainstream, and so lacks reliable sources - this was created before I had read WP:RS, and so I hold my hands up. Æthelred (talk) 20:14, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.