Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English country music
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. JForget 00:23, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- English country music (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is unreferenced, and because of the nebulous subject matter, I see no way to reference it. Even if we verify the events described, we cannot easily verify that the culturual significance is anything other than the article author's opinion. Chutznik (talk) 06:28, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It's worth noting that there are categories implicitly underpinned by the subject of the article: Category:English country music songwriters and Category:English country musicians, plus subcat Category:English country music groups. But it's more implicit than actual, due to the flagged problems in the article's content. AllyD (talk) 11:05, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep After a session with Google I've added a couple of article references. Its content needs broadened (the Digby ref can assist with that) but I think there's enough to say it should stay. AllyD (talk) 11:23, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Almost all country music songs are written in English, although sometimes some Spanish phrases or words are thrown in. Mandsford (talk) 16:04, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:44, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:27, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per AllyD. Needs more work though.--TrustMeTHROW! 03:36, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.