Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English adaptations of Tokyo Mew Mew

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete looking in to the merge proposal the basic information about the english translations already exists in Tokyo Mew Mew with additional information in Tokyo Mew Mew (manga) which also has a merge proposal with Tokyo Mew Mew under discussion[1]. Additionally character information covers the translation versions differences both in the Tokyo Mew Mew article and the daughter articles. Gnan garra 07:11, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

English adaptations of Tokyo Mew Mew

Excessive details almost entirely "sourced" from fan sites with a stated hatred of the English adaptation. List huge list of minute differences are not notable enough to stand alone. Full of WP:NPOV violations and WP:OR in deciding what the "correct" translations are, per fansubbers and fansites. A discussion of the English adaptation could, and should, be covered in the main article, just like any other anime series. Collectonian (talk) 03:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions. —Collectonian (talk) 03:56, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: It is almost entirely original research and is uncited. I suppose if you consider linking to copyright vio web-sites as "references", then you might have a winner. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 04:40, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and for same reasons as International adaptations of Tokyo Mew Mew (which I nominated over here). NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 06:07, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge. The importance of comparison pages has been established elsewhere in the anime project. (Yeah, I know of "other crap exists," but if a Wiki project says a certain type of page should exist for certain articles, than it ought to exist.) I think secondary sources could be found to clear up the OR objection. Lack of citations now doesn't mean there aren't any. Buspar (talk) 20:22, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge key content into the Tokyo Mew Mew article. This content is required per the Manual of Style for anime- and manga-related articles. The Tokyo Mew Mew article currently has very little content regarding this aspect. — G.A.S 05:34, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree, in theory, but I think this article is too unsalvageable for merging. A freshly written section would be a better choice for the main Mew Mew article, done as part of its over all clean up. Collectonian (talk) 05:36, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Selective merge per WP:FICT into Tokyo Mew Mew. The person who does the work, though, probably needs to be familiar with the issues and content. I don't envy the job. —Quasirandom (talk) 03:02, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.