Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Engineering square industrial park

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination. (non-admin closure) Deadbeef 02:05, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Engineering square industrial park[edit]

Engineering square industrial park (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article CSD'd a couple of times. Now includes references but can't find enough for the subject to pass WP:GNG. Sam Walton (talk) 21:31, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:38, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:38, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:38, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 00:15, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I can't verify the reliability of the Arabic sources or some of the other foreign newspapers, but superficially it seems likely that the references already included are sufficient for WP:GNG. I think the current discussion should be closed as no-consensus without prejudice to revisiting this AfD if someone qualified to comment on that recommends it. --Sammy1339 (talk) 21:12, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:41, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.