Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Energy Elephant (company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:16, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Energy Elephant (company)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Rentier (talk) 22:55, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:25, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:25, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- WP:PROMO on a minor tech startup. Even includes the company's mission statement: "EnergyElephant's mission is to help users "Make Better Energy Decisions" by organising and analysing their energy data!" Etc. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:37, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - Promo, tonal, and apparent COI issues aside, while there does seem to have been some coverage of the company (which has perhaps <20 employees?), it appears to have been relatively trivial in nature, otherwise self published, or "dressed up" and republished press-release materials. Is possibly simply a case of WP:TOOSOON. Guliolopez (talk) 19:43, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. Coverage fails criteria for establishing notability. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 11:05, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.