Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enemy Unbound

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Absence. So Why 10:47, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Enemy Unbound

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NALBUM and WP:GNG of the 2 sources one doesn't even mention this album and the other is a blog review. Nothing found of note in a WP:BEFORE search. Dom from Paris (talk) 14:05, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 14:06, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 14:06, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have nominated the other 2 albums of this group for deletion but as they were not created at the same time or by the same user I did not bundle but they are all 3 in the same vein.
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/From Your Grave
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riders of the Plague

Dom from Paris (talk) 14:12, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or redirect with history - Keep, or redirect with history as valid search term. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:16, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is your reasoning for keep? Dom from Paris (talk) 14:51, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:39, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - @Domdeparis:, I am indifferent between Keep and "Redirect with history", so long as the history remains in tact with this valid search term. If the band is non notable, then it too should be nominated for AFD. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:04, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I get that but normally a keep !vote even if it is tagged onto a redirect !vote should be motivated by guidelines or policy or may be ignored and as per WP:DISCUSSAFD please do not make recommendations on the course of action to be taken that are not sustained by arguments. Dom from Paris (talk) 14:39, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:07, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.