Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Endophrastically
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete per WP:SNOW. I'm endophrastically closing this discussion. Elkman (Elkspeak) 16:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Endophrastically[edit]
- Endophrastically (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Made up word. A google search reveals exactly zero hits. Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. Even if evidence of existence outside one school comes to light, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Mattinbgn\ talk 10:35, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment An earlier WP:CSD#A1 tag was removed by the article's creator. -- Mattinbgn\ talk 10:37, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Mattinbgn\ talk 10:37, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I can't see any reference to this word in any online dictionary. I also believe it's a made-up word RyanLupin (talk/contribs) 10:46, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Even the "alternate spelling" shows no usage Yngvarr (t) (c) 10:49, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Neologism, patent nonsense. Keb25 10:52, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a Neologism. John Vandenberg 10:58, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- nonsense. - Longhair\talk 10:59, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Neologism, it is just nonsense. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 12:03, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Violates almost every deletion rationale I can think of; OR, MADE UP, WP:CSD#A1, WP is not a Dictionary, the list goes on and on. Spawn Man 12:19, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, WP:CSD#G1. shoy 13:40, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. "Endophrastically" is not a cromulent word. Rob T Firefly 14:51, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete , WP:NEO, no indication of notability. NawlinWiki 16:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It would be copacetic to remove all such undocumented neologisms from Wikipedia. Edison 16:42, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.