Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Encyclopedia of Music in the Social and Behavioral Sciences

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 04:48, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopedia of Music in the Social and Behavioral Sciences[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book. The title gets 6 google hits. The article was started by William Forde Thompson, who is the author of the book. Vanity page. Was put through PROD, but not AfD. Bueller 007 (talk) 17:39, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No secondary sources and this is using Wikipedia to promote his publication which is against policy. WP:NOTADVERT. He both edits his biography and this article with his account and several IPs like 58.172.242.88 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 58.172.253.70 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) to promote both himself and the book Ammarpad (talk) 13:05, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: anyone else?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 00:15, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - lack of secondary sources. PhilKnight (talk) 00:45, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Me too! Fails the GNG. L3X1 Happy2018! (distænt write) 02:58, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.