Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Encina Street
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ronhjones (Talk) 01:42, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Encina Street (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. Supposed "famous" former residents do not appear notable and are not cited. Despite the "See also", the street is not on the US National Register of Historic Places. Gallery of homes hardly appropriate could arguably be a BLP-type issue since they appear to be random images of random residences with the exact address given, and I'm not certain if the names listed are current residents. Even if all to be believed, no sources or references given. ♪ daTheisen(talk) 02:44, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 03:10, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no evidence of notability. See National Register of Historic Places listings in Tulare County, California — there aren't any Register-listed historic districts in Visalia except for an airport, and there aren't any Register-listed buildings in the city on this street. Perhaps a local historic district, but those don't always get enough coverage that they're necessarily notable, and notability isn't proven here. Nyttend (talk) 03:19, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, although there is some coverage, it appears to be insufficient to meet notability requirements set forth in WP:GNG. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 08:50, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.