Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ena Kadic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ya sh ! 06:23, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ena Kadic

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: Ena Kadic and redirect (Ena Kadić) as non-notable. I understand that beauty pageant winners can be considered notable, but not each and everyone regardless of the how slim and minimal the credentials. Tragedy of her death also does not indicate notability. Quis separabit? 21:48, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Most Miss Austrias do not have their own article, and there is nothing in her article to suggest that she is particularly notable. JDDJS (talk) 22:30, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete sources do not indicate notability.-- danntm ^T _C 00:03, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 02:09, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 02:09, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per a substantial amount of coverage in reliable sources: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Ena+Kadic%22&tbm=nws Linguist 111^talk 10:37, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, subject of significant coverage from multiple different reliable sources over a period of time. — Cirt (talk) 01:43, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, meets WP:ANYBIO, having received a notable award, argument about a lack of articles for other winners is a case of WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST. also, scope of Wikipedia:WikiProject Beauty Pageants reads "This WikiProject will cover the creation, editing, and organization of articles related to state, national and international beauty pageants, their delegates and winners." which therefore includes Miss Austria winners. Maybe, some of the above deleters can assist? Coolabahapple (talk) 15:18, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep All contestants at Miss World meet our basic notability rule that topics have reliably sourced information showing that they attract the attention of the world at large. I have recently verified at the WP:RS noticeboard that a Miss World biography is accepted as a WP:RS for personal biographical information, including age. Massive international coverage is found on the first page of the Google "Find sources" link, including from England, Ireland, Australia, Phillipines, and yahoo.com. Likewise, the link provided by Linguist111, of Google news, shows the same pattern including Italy and Hungary. The nomination has not followed the minimal search documented at WP:BEFORE. Nor has the nomination checked and reported on the effect on the "What Links Here" were this article to be deleted, nor considered that non-notability is not a deletion argument when the topic is covered elsewhere in the encyclopedia (see WP:Insignificance). The delete !votes have not shown any attempt at determining notability. Unscintillating (talk) 22:31, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.