Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/En Mi Lugar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A Traintalk 06:57, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

En Mi Lugar[edit]

En Mi Lugar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Low-charting album on niche charts (certainly not national charts) so fails WP:NALBUM. Clearly fails WP:GNG Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:22, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:50, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:50, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 08:50, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:09, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The album charting would be the only criteria that would qualify for notability, but is not verifiable on either AllMusic or Billboard. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:53, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete clearly fails WP:NALBUM. LibStar (talk) 03:03, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.