Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Empire of Angyalistan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of micronations. Sandstein 14:04, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Empire of Angyalistan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:N due to not having enough independent sources.^[1] Alfa-ketosav (talk) 15:26, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ or at least they aren't in the article

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 15:33, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 15:33, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 15:35, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think all the articles about nations-inside-people's-heads that have come to AfD in the last year or so have been deleted, but I don’t know how to search for the discussions. Mccapra (talk) 15:48, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment My first thought is that this is comical rubbish. Even their Instagram has only 378 followers. Twitter is a little better with 758. Yet I find references: 1, [2], 3. Apparently they have an Embassy and sign treaties? WITW? Lightburst (talk) 15:56, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment our coverage of micronations appears to be severely lacking and variable. This and the Principality of Sealand are categorically different sorts of places. This? Maybe a merger to a list at best. Jclemens (talk) 16:14, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge - agree with this. There must be some sort of article or list on micronations that this sort of thing can merge into, and if there's isn't, it should be created as a catch-all for all the many made-up micronations inside of peoples' heads. Iskandar323 (talk) 15:54, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  Comment - with four sources, I think it qualifies for inclusion as a "notable micronation". Iskandar323 (talk) 15:57, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. BEFORE gives nothing, but there is a chance sourcing exists in other languages (French?). If so, ping me if good sources are found and I'll review them, if machine translation/etc. works well enough. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:52, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm the one who created this original article. I should have mentioned following extra sources: the book "Mikronationer – På besök i hemgjorda länder" of Jakob Joellson and "Royaumes d'aventure: des premier atlas des micronations" of Bruno Fuligni. I created the article after a large publication in Le Monde about French micronations: https://www.lemonde.fr/series-d-ete/article/2021/08/18/l-empire-d-angyalistan-mallarme-et-pierre-dac-pour-boussoles_6091687_3451060.html --Delle89 (talk) 13:38, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:54, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with List of micronations, where the topic is already mentioned; individual notability not established with significant coverage. Avilich (talk) 18:52, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There we go - that will do! Iskandar323 (talk) 19:44, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[1] r at least they aren't in the article

[1]