Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emotibyte

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:20, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Emotibyte[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dicdef, may not meet Wiktionary standards either. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 16:37, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete as a WP:NEOLOGISM and made up term per CSD A11. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, does not meet Wiktionary's WT:CFI. Daniel Carrero (talk) 05:53, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Lyricists pretty frequently take creative liberties with language. It takes a lot more than that to make the neologism itself a notable subject. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 16:11, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:43, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.