Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EmoTrance

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2009 November 13.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --Tone 11:22, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

EmoTrance

Contested WP:PROD. Fails WP:FRINGE; there are no references from independent, mainstream sources. The lone cited source is a promotional website associated with the subject; most of the cited books are by DragonRising, a small specialty publisher of EmoTrance literature. There is no non-trivial coverage in independent, reliable secondary sources to satisfy WP:N, and no coverage in mainstream sources to satisfy WP:FRINGE. Without such sources, the topic is non-notable and the article can never get beyond a promotional brochure. MastCell ^Talk 20:51, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:44, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of independent sources. Zero Google Scholar hits. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 21:50, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No independent sources, sounds more like a musical genre to me. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 22:05, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Oh, definitely. If nothing else, it reads like an advertisement, and without reliable mainstream sources, that's not fixable. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 18:15, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, of course. There isn't anything important in this. --X093i (talk) 13:59, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I didn't find any independent sources either. If they appear at some point in the future, then an article could always be created at that time. WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:18, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.