Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel Pierre-Antoine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Per the sources discovered in the discussion). (non-admin closure) Winged Blades^Godric 03:14, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Emmanuel Pierre-Antoine[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO, as tagged since August 2008. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:29, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:51, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:51, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Through these sources: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] he seems to satisfy WP:GNG. Not to offend contributing editors, but it is obvious that the article is poorly written and vastly under-sourced, but doesn't warrant deletion. Savvyjack23 (talk) 22:01, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, the references found by SavvyJack23 (other than #2, which is a brief mention), are enough to show that he passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:43, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.