Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmanuel Muscat (Maltese footballer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 01:33, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Emmanuel Muscat (Maltese footballer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Non-notable footballer who never played in a fully professional league J Mo 101 (talk) 10:34, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment there is another Maltese footballer named Emmanuel Muscat who is a professional footballer playing for Wellington Phoenix and has represented Malta internationally. In the event this player is found non-notable (which appears likely to me but I'll give it due diligence tomorrow) I'd suggest a redirect. --ClubOranje^T 10:50, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 10:56, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence he passes WP:ATHLETE or WP:GNG. Also no need for a redirect as there is only one primary topic. Giant Snowman 10:57, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sign of significant notability, fails WP:GNG and WP:ATHLETE. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 13:26, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - All of Maltese league football is semi-pro. Therefore, the subject clearly fails WP:ATHLETE, and there is no indication he passes WP:GNG either. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:06, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, no evidence he has played at a notable level per NSPORTS, no coverage to justify inclusion under GNG.--ClubOranje^T 07:42, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.