Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emmantiensien

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merged and redirected to Seelie Court (Dungeons & Dragons). What happens to that page after this is unclear. CitiCat^♫ 03:56, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Emmantiensien[edit]

Contested prod for a single sentence article about a fictional god. I am also nominating the following article for the same reason:

These articles have no content, context, analysis or secondary sources to demonstrate sufficient notability for inclusion in Wikipedia.--Gavin Collins 17:37, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Is there an appropriate article about gods in D&D that these can be merged into? I agree with Gavin that they probably don't warrant their own article, but I'm not familiar enough with D&D articles to know where these might be merged rather than just deleted. Rray 18:28, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction & fantasy deletions. --Gavin Collins 17:37, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge both into Seelie Court (Dungeons & Dragons).--Robbstrd 18:41, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge & Redirect These don't warrent seperate articles. Sources need to be added, and links to the Scottish mythos they are based on, but that can be done with an article cleanup. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Turlo Lomon (talk • contribs) 19:54, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Robbstrd & Redirect per Turlo Lomon. BOZ 21:58, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Following a prod, I attempted a redirect earlier today to List of Greyhawk deities and was reverted on it. Then the prod was removed, and hence the AfD. <shrug> No skin off my back. --Craw-daddy | T | 22:23, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. As fair warning, I would suspect that Seelie Court (Dungeons & Dragons) has the same notability problems that this article has. --Craw-daddy | T | —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 22:27, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.