Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Jesson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:50, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Emma Jesson[edit]
- Emma Jesson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Another non-notable weatherperson. The most verifiable thing about her is that she's dating someone. Drmies (talk) 21:59, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. LadyofShalott 04:40, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. LadyofShalott 04:42, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:50, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A search through the history shows that this article was tagged for notability problems right after it was created in 2006. Later on it was marked for deletion, and then the deletion tag was removed along with the notability tag, all without any change to the contents of the page. Anyway, a web search shows that there is certainly nothing notable about this individual. Fails WP:PEOPLE. Just because a person is on TV, that does not make them notable. MisterRichValentine (talk) 00:57, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Jesson is a less notable figure than the subjects of some of the other articles which have been removed recently. 89.248.29.41 (talk) 17:22, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.