Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emma Bolger

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Redirect if you want, but I really don't like redirecting BLP's to one thing they did. Courcelles (talk) 01:01, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Emma Bolger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actress who fails NACTOR & GNG - I originally redirected to In America (film) as assumed she was only notable for being in that, Anyway the article contains no refs and I couldn't find any myself either, I propose redirecting back to the film. –Davey2010Talk 21:34, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 22:13, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect again obviously as she's not fully notable yet and this her best known role. SwisterTwister talk 00:23, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Apart from an IMDB Profile, I could not find anything close enough to establish that this actress has "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", and hence this actress does not meet WP:GNG. I also believe that this actress fails WP:NACTOR. If she had significant roles in film, a large fan base or a significant "cult" following, or made unique contributions to a field of entertainment, there would be reliable coverage to easily show that this is true. However, I do not see them. ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 01:00, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.