Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily pramik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:49, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Emily pramik

I'm not sure what a youth governor does, but consider it an assertion of notability and I doubt she's speediable. Bringing it here for discussion. Abstain. - Mgm|^(talk) 13:46, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A total 18 GHits makes me think it could have been speedied. Anyway, delete. yandman 14:25, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As not notable. She is a "youth governer" in a model legislature organized under the auspices of the YMCA to give young Americans an appreciation of how democratic governments ought to work. Youth and Government is a laudable educational program, not a functioning part of government. Gosgood 15:08, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete "youth governer" is actually a high-school thing, not any sort of government office. No other claims to notability. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:30, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not worthy of an entry. Nardman1 21:05, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As an editor who tagged this entry for notability, I was on the fence about whether "youth governor" was enough of an assertion of notability to avoid speedy deletion. Anyways . . . based on the information I've found, I don't consider the office to be at all notable and, if it counts for anything, I don't think that the article was created for the serious purpose of making Wikipedia better . . . note nn info--clearly unencyclopedic and written by a friend or something--in the original draft of the article. I deleted it and tagged the article for notability to give the author a chance to add any information about how the office of "youth governor" was notable. Obviously, none has been added. janejellyroll 01:10, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Andrew Lenahan. --Metropolitan90 03:47, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "Has had many unique and interesting experiences"? Somehow she doesn't seem unique enough if that is the best thing that could be written about her. User:Dimadick
Delete per Gosgood. WMMartin 15:14, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.