Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Sears

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:26, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Sears[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable model, sources are all tabloids, (daily mail is not allowed), GQ is decent but one GQ source is nothing, the NPR source does not even mention her (it's from 2009), i could not find any reliable sourcing. Dating someone is not grounds for notability too. Sourcing referring to Trump's tape does not prove her notability either. GuzzyG (talk) 07:11, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:00, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:00, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable model.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:23, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:14, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The only real coverage I could find was for going out with Shane Warne. Doctorhawkes (talk) 10:20, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.