Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Baldoni

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Sandstein 09:21, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Emily Baldoni

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see how the person is notable for anything other than marrying a film producer. A source search at this point only turned up sources about said producer [redacted]. Quick, Spot the Quetzalcoatl! (talk) 07:40, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Women, and Sweden. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:22, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I agree with the previous reply. She has been in prominent roles in the past and is currently still acting. Her most recent role is in It Ends with Us which was released earlier this year. Foreverxnature (talk) 16:59, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Meets NACTOR: prominent roles in Coherence (film), Identical (film), The Lost Tribe (2010 film) and Grizzly Park. I must comment that the WP:BEFORE apparently consisted of removing the list of notable films and tv series where she appeared before nominating the article. Sjö (talk) 10:27, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep. Clearly meets NACTOR, and I consider a nomination borderline bad-faith when it guts the article to a stub immediately before AfD. Chubbles (talk) 21:04, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It does pass NACTOR. Keivan.f^Talk 21:43, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per NACTOR. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 15:41, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep agree with above. Kiwipat (talk) 06:02, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with the above, she has been credited in major films and removing her page would just decrease information on wikipedia Niccommon (talk) 22:59, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep She has been in many notable films. We should not delete article based on assumption of others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BonitueBera (talk • contribs) 00:29, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep subject looks notable and has enough news coverage. Meets NACTOR. Mysecretgarden (talk) 07:26, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.