Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Agius
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Secret account 23:23, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Emily Agius (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable child performer. Article has considerable WP:COI. The only google hit I can find for "Jrock" AND "Emily Agius" together is one U-tube video. Several references have been added recently, but these are either to Wikipedia (and don't mention Emily) or to first party websites. When I search just for "Emily Agius" I get only this article and various trivial results from social pages, except for a couple that are for a different Emily Agius. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 05:11, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. This is a conflict of interest if ever I saw one. There is an unhealthy (total) reliance on self-published sources. WP is not myspace Ohconfucius (talk) 11:38, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As non-notable ad. for subject. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:27, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Inadequately sourced BLP of a person of marginal notability. RMHED (talk) 19:28, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:10, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:11, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:11, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per all of the above. Theseeker4 (talk) 17:55, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.