Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emilio Ferro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. UPE, extensive sockfarm Drmies (talk) 18:28, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Emilio Ferro

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think that WP:ARTIST is satisfied. Most of the coverage in the article is either brief, e.g. [1] just lists his name or not independent e.g. [2]. This source from designboom seems to be the best coverage, but I am unsure if it's reliable and it's just coverage of a single exhibition. SmartSE (talk) 14:29, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Italy. Shellwood (talk) 14:32, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, extensive sourcing meets GNC, plus the artist was allowed to construct the light sculpture and exhibit among the pyramids of Giza. A pretty good coup, which wouldn't have been allowed if the artist was an unknown or incompetent, so goes to notability. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:08, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 14:43, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.