Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emiliano Hysi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 02:47, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Emiliano Hysi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Technically passes WP:NFOOTBALL due to playing one minute of professional football over three years ago. He left that club in 2017 and has not signed for a club since. He has almost definitely retired from professional football. Most importantly, this fails WP:GNG. Spiderone 19:05, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:06, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:06, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:06, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 19:08, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG, more important than scraping by on NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 20:00, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG (the sportekspres article is close to in-depth coverage, but there needs to be more, and I can only find his interview with Cray Valley FC which doesn't count for GNG purposes). Jogurney (talk) 04:20, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Does not meet WP:GNG, Alex-h (talk) 11:43, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is shows how ludicrous the current standard is and exactly why we need to scrap it for something more reasonable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:27, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.