Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embryonic development

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Embryo#Development. RL0919 (talk) 06:20, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Embryonic development

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems to be covered well under Embryo#Development, where it is sourced and in more detail than the recently created article. As a result, I propose that we redirect Embryonic development to Embryo#Development, where the topic can be adequately covered. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 03:38, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I created this page. Your argument makes sense to me. The only thing I would say is that Embryo#Development doesn't currently link to Plant embryonic development (it does have links to the other two pages on specific types of embryonic development, which are Human embryonic development and Animal embryonic development). So I would argue that we'd need to add links to Plant embryonic development in the appropriate places on Embryo#Development before deleting this page. I will try to remember to do that later as I need to go now and I don't want to do it in a rush and mess it up (but obviously if someone else beats me to it that's great). Famedog (talk) 14:19, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I have now added the link on the Embryo#Development page. Famedog (talk) 08:57, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 03:38, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 03:38, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 03:38, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 03:38, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as per the afd. Hyperwave11 (talk) 05:08, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect, given that there are already separate articles on Animal embryonic development and Plant embryonic development, and anything that can be said about what traits these processes share is already well-covered at the redirect target. BD2412 T 06:05, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect, unnecessary partial duplicate. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 12:45, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as per above comments.--Iztwoz (talk) 13:48, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.