Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Colombia, Warsaw
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Ambassador of Colombia to Poland et al. (non-admin closure) czar · · 08:17, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Embassy of Colombia, Warsaw (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG. simply an address listing where it is located. being located near "near the National Stadium, the Fryderyk Chopin University of Music, and the Asia and Pacific Museum" adds nothing to notability. those wanting to keep must show actual third party sources. LibStar (talk) 02:51, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:30, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Ambassador of Colombia to Poland, Colombia—Poland relations, List of diplomatic missions of Colombia, or some other suitable target. Why keep bringing embassies to AfD when there are viable alternatives to deletion? Pburka (talk) 03:00, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- because I believe they should be deleted, the articles should not have been created in the first place purely to be merged into other articles. LibStar (talk) 04:33, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- There is, I think, a clear community consensus to merge these articles rather than delete them, as demonstrated in previous discussions. Pburka (talk) 02:56, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- there has also been consensus to delete Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Estonia, Ottawa, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Gabon, Ottawa, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Argentina, Kiev. LibStar (talk) 03:12, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Two of those had at least as many merge !votes as delete !votes. The only reason they were deleted was because there were no obvious merge targets. That's not the case for this article. Pburka (talk) 12:18, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- there has also been consensus to delete Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Estonia, Ottawa, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Gabon, Ottawa, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Argentina, Kiev. LibStar (talk) 03:12, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- There is, I think, a clear community consensus to merge these articles rather than delete them, as demonstrated in previous discussions. Pburka (talk) 02:56, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- because I believe they should be deleted, the articles should not have been created in the first place purely to be merged into other articles. LibStar (talk) 04:33, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 03:42, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Redirect per Pburka, and second using WP:ATD when possible rather than directly going to AfD. Ansh666 06:00, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge. Unless the relations article is very clearly not notable, it should be merged per WP:BARE, WP:CHEAP, and WP:REFUND. Bearian (talk) 21:43, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge. All I can find is a two-sentence entry at Jan Patryas; Henryk Szczepaniak; Ministerstwo Spraw Zagranicznych (1979). Stosunki dyplomatyczne Polski 1944-1981 r: Ameryka (1944-1978). Pań. Wydawn. Naukowe. Retrieved 21 July 2013.. The only value in the article is that it geolocates the entity on a map; but I don't see how we can justify keeping it. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:02, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.