Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emam Hasan (Mosque)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:35, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Emam Hasan (Mosque)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, no indication of notability and no coverage in reliable third-party sources. -- Irn (talk) 18:04, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:48, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:48, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:48, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: What's the name in Farsi, and what did your searches on that reveal? Sam Sailor ^Talk! 02:22, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I would even consider WP:A1 speedy delete, because there are so many mosques named after Hasan ibn Ali (probably the 3rd most sacred figure in Shia Islam), that it is unclear which one is meant. The external links additionally lead to various Imam Hasan Mosques. The first one, for example, is a neighbourhood mosque in the northwest of Shahremam (32°13′57″N 48°25′18″E / 32.2326°N 48.4217°E / 32.2326; 48.4217; west Iran), which conflicts with the description of being in Masshad (northeast Iran). - HyperGaruda (talk) 07:42, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You might be interested to know that similar pages were speedy deleted twice on fa-wiki (page log; same page but slightly different title) these past few days. The first one was recreated just moments ago and is now at AfD. - HyperGaruda (talk) 07:52, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also of interest is its sister page on Wikidata and in particular the page history, which gives an overview of all the added and deleted other-wiki pages. - HyperGaruda (talk) 08:23, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete.Not prominent درخشـان/^◄ 07:56, 17 July 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Derakhshan52 (talk • contribs)
Delete because it does not pass a single factor for my standards of notable houses of worship. Merely being named for a saint is not a factor, as notabiliuty is not inherited. Bearian (talk) 17:40, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.