Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elvis Kabashi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:53, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Elvis Kabashi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested by IP, no rationale given. This is a non-notable youth player, article fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 11:19, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:20, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails NFOOTBALL; not a notable football player. A quick Google search revealed only stat sites. Vaca tion 9 12:55, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - he has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:05, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:38, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:39, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom, appears to only have one unused Serie A sub appearance. Fenix down (talk) 09:23, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom as he has not played in a fully professional league, at senior international level, or been the subject of non-trivial coverage from multiple independent sources, failing WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. C 679 20:20, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.