Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elsweet Rufino
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:07, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Elsweet Rufino (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
BLP article about a non-notable person. No Google news stories, and the only a few trivial mentions in Google books. The only references provided in the article are press releases or equivalent. - MrX 21:39, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Google News and Books searches provided nothing relevant and it seems most of the links are affiliated with the subject and magazine. The article claims she has worked with Kim Kardashian and yet there aren't any third-party sources to support this and the sentence is vague as to how she worked with them. I'm not familiar with this magazine but the website looks a blog rather than a professional magazine. SwisterTwister talk 23:14, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable, even if her employer is. --Phazakerley (talk) 04:51, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:26, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 12:26, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not notable in her own right. Even if she did work with Kim Kardashian &c, notability is not inherited. Agree that the magazine doesn't seem notable either. --Noiratsi (talk) 12:51, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.