Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elliston Campbell

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:19, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Elliston Campbell[edit]

Elliston Campbell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable graduate of Newington College. He was an electrical engineering lecturer, but no research achievements are disclosed, and he was the leader of a state chapter of an engineering society. Other than that he was interested in religion and left his estate to that religion but there is no indication that he is notable as a religious scholar Adsfvdf54gbb (talk) 12:14, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:59, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! From Babymissfortune 21:38, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The coverage of people with connections to Newington College has clearly gone way overboard. No sign of notability is present here. On the other hand the comments by Publicschoolboy show a total lack of the acceptable form of discourse on Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:48, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete There is some non routine reporting on the subject, but not sufficient. Aoziwe (talk) 08:47, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Aoziwe. The Drover's Wife (talk) 09:18, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Can't find anything here to support notability. (But can we perhaps delete or at least strike the disruptive nonsense above? It adds nothing and has been added by a SPA.) Frickeg (talk) 10:50, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.