Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elliot John Crosby
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:09, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Elliot John Crosby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
BLP1E. a one hit wonder type thing. I prodded this a few days ago, and the prod was removed without explanation. Roxy, in the middle. wooF 17:57, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:55, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:55, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete doesnt appear to be particularly noteworthy, none of the others listed as national record holders have aspired to articles and no article on the so called 300-game. MilborneOne (talk) 19:00, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Definitely a case of WP:BLP1E and lacks the significant independent coverage to meet WP:GNG. A nice achievement, but not one that automatically guarantees WP notability. Papaursa (talk) 01:58, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- Delete bowling a 300-game as a 12-year old is clearly WP:BLP1E; there have been no substantive changes to the article over the past decade since that game (and Google gives no hits for recent info) clearly suggesting he is not a public figure now. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:23, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.