Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ellie Cachette

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:43, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ellie Cachette

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article on a non-notable subject. Subject has not received mentions in multiple third party news articles. Subject was interviewed in a Forbes blog, however that's not exactly a third-party source. Most of the article is unsourced and personal in nature which indicates the article was written by someone with a close connection. Gems include: "In her free time, she is a competitive sailor and member of the St. Francis Yacht Club." Delete. CitizenNeutral (talk) 02:34, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom – I agree that the two main citations are less than satisfactory as reliable sources for bios. CEO of a startup trying to gain notoriety. Created by single purpose account. Watch out for that walled garden in the making, and delete this quickly, before an article on ConsumerBell appears! ;-) Ohconfucius ^{ping / poke} 04:34, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I thought the Forbes article might save her, but it is not an actual article. It is a submission from an unpaid "contributor". Forbes even put a disclaimer at the botton. This is a vanity article of an up and coming, but WP:TOOSOON entrepreneur.--Nixie9✉ 16:31, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No significant coverage in 3rd party reliable sources; hence, it fails WP:V. dci | TALK 17:24, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.