Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Grosz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) (t) Josve05a (c) 17:59, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Grosz[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is not notable. Unable to find any significant references other than the published books. Primefac (talk) 21:01, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator - article has been significantly improved and notability established. Primefac (talk) 17:56, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 22:02, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I have JSTOR access, and there are 1,548 hits there for "Elizabeth Grosz". On Google Books there are many hits apart from her own numerous books: e.g. [1]. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy has half-a-dozen mentions, e.g. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-body/. She is a well-known feminist philosopher. Charles Matthews (talk) 05:42, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:PROF#C5: she has a named chair at Duke, which I just added to the article. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:17, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per both of the above. Widely cited and influential, plus presumed notability for the named chair. EricEnfermero ^HOWDY! 08:20, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.