Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eliza Bleu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:10, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eliza Bleu[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable. The subject seems to fail WP:SUSTAINED and WP:NBASIC. A collection of very minor items doesn't make one notable, and notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. The only source that covers her in any detail here doesn't even have consensus as being reliable. - Who is John Galt? ✉ 00:09, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Thriley (talk) 00:29, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no coverage in RS, mentioned a few times in the Daily Beast. Does not meet notability standards for streamers, or GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 00:50, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Crime, and Entertainment. Skynxnex (talk) 04:07, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Deelte how the hell did this stub get out of draft space? Slatersteven (talk) 14:52, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment She has been getting a lot of coverage lately on Twitter and YouTube and some major podcast. https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/entertainment-celebrity/anyone-questioning-alleged-human-trafficking-survivor-eliza-bleus-story-is-getting-banned-on-twitter/ar-AA175QIr shows the entire recent ordeal, the timeline of her story about being trafficked not lining up, there an increasing amount of evidence she made it all up. Note the MSN article mentions her past names she went by, so some results can perhaps be found by searching them. The name she was born with is Eliza Morthland. She has been known as Eliza Siep, Eliza Knows, Eliza Cuts, and now Eliza Bleu. Dream Focus 16:26, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That MSN story is aggregated from wealthofgeeks.com, which doesn't look like a source I would trust for controversial BLP information. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:31, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just a few from their front page today, Altcoin Season Is in The Corner: Big Gainers Will Be Algorand, Polygon, and Budblockz, 21 Simple Passive Income Ideas for Making Money While You Chill, If You’re Getting Interviews but Not the Offer, You Need To Try These 6 Things. The only other article that the author wrote for the site was How Many Work Hours and Days Are in a Year? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:37, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
UnHerd seems like a reliable source. https://unherd.com/thepost/whats-the-truth-about-eliza-bleu-and-does-it-matter/ Dream Focus 17:08, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The only mention on RSN is in this archive, which doesn't look great. According to the about page As you may have guessed from our strange spelling, UnHerd aims to do two things: to push back against the herd mentality with new and bold thinking, and to provide a platform for otherwise unheard ideas, people and places. It's an opinion and commentary site focused on non-mainstream ideas. Not great for a BLP. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:16, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't appear to meet the notability criteria. There is no in-depth coverage by reliable sources. Keivan.f^Talk 21:34, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I wasn't able to find any good sourcing. There's a few recent things on non-RS about her not having been trafficked, but nothing that adds up to notability. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:13, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the dearth of coverage in independent, reliable sources. As Bleu: [1] tabloids, zines, non-entitious podcasts or similarly in news outlets. SN54129 16:13, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - can't find enough in-depth coverage to show she passes WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:30, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I carefully read and re-read the article, checking on each reference, and have concluded that the subject doesn’t meet WP:GNG. Coverage is WP:BASIC and fails WP:SUSTAINED. It’s also important to note that notability is WP:NOTINHERITED. If the subject was notable, I would be in favor of keeping. However, the subject doesn’t meet notability guidelines so my take is delete. Shawn Teller (talk) 03:50, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.