Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eligos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to The Lesser Key of Solomon. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:02, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eligos[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is a content fork of The Lesser Key of Solomon and fails to meet the notability criteria; one of 72 types of demon mentioned in the main article. The article is unlikely to ever become more than trivial as no other sources say more about this demon than Ars Goetia, and can be easily merged back to The Lesser Key of Solomon. Wikipedia does not benefit from having an article for every religious or mythical character or neologism from every book ever published. Ash (talk) 23:31, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. -- Ash (talk) 23:32, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge - I've been meaning to get around to it, but I'm a terrible procrastinator. Ian.thomson (talk) 00:16, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. Valid encyclopedic topic, but if nothing else can be written about this subject then it belongs in the The Lesser Key of Solomon article. However, if this merge is to be performed properly then ALL the demons with a link in this list: The Lesser Key of Solomon#The 72 Demons must be merged otherwise this should not be deleted. -- œ ^™ 14:16, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. -- Ash (talk) 15:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Without Prejudice to Merge Same rationale provided for every other goetic demon to come across the AfD.Simonm223 (talk) 20:11, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.