Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elias Seixas UFO incident
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 07:41, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Elias Seixas UFO incident (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Another Brazilian UFO article that does not seem to be reliably sourced or noticed enough to pass our notability criteria. I listed it as a biography because that is essentially what it is, but it fails WP:BIO too. ScienceApologist (talk) 04:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It doesn't establish notability. One of the sources is non-English, and the other is a 404. Theymos (talk) 06:29, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Non-English sources are perfectly valid. Zetawoof(ζ) 07:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Total nonsense which doesn't meet WP:N or WP:V Nick-D (talk) 06:48, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Essentially an article about a man who says that he was abducted by aliens. However, I have more trouble with the claim that "he presents his story on lectures and congresses", with no source to back that up. If it were shown that he is indeed a traveling celebrity in the UFO world, that would be different, although I dont see anything in Google to back that up. Most of the hits seem to be a rehash of his story. Mandsford (talk) 19:49, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, the "references" in the article establish neither factuality nor notability. Tim Vickers (talk) 22:53, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. —Artw (talk) 09:37, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.