Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eliane Lust

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 01:11, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eliane Lust

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While this article is likely a copyright violation, it also doesn't appear to be notable. All of the coverage for the article appears to be passing mentions with no in-depth coverage to speak of. Therefore, the article fails WP:GNG, WP:MUSICBIO and WP:ARTIST. I do not believe this article to be worthy of inclusion. Thank you, ceradon (talk • contribs) 06:45, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This article fails WP:GNG by a mile. Eat me, I'm a red bean (take a huge bite)^{i've made a huge mess} 07:08, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I would have to agree as nominated and as per Eat me, I'm a red bean said. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 05:09, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The copyvio is the main concern but my searches aren't finding anything outstanding to suggest possible notability at this time, this, this (one "SF Examiner") and this. SwisterTwister talk 05:28, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.