Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elenas Models

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:31, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Elenas Models[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nominating article for deletion, fails to meet WP:GNG. Sources cited by the article include a company listing cite [1], an interview [2] with the company CEO, and a link to the company trademark [3]. Finding further sources that meet WP:VER unlikely. The article currently serves only to promote and advertise the business, and does not add to the goals of the encyclopedia. SamHolt6 (talk) 13:11, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:16, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:16, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTADVERTISING, and lack of quality WP:RS to meet WP:GNG. The interview is blocked for me, but I can tell from the domain that I would not consider it a RS. Everything else is non-independent: either their website or stuff like PR Newswire. - GretLomborg (talk) 20:36, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per WP:NOTPROMOTION and fails WP:CORP. None of the sources listed in article meet WP:Verifiability. G-searches provide nothing helpful. A search of Russian wiki to find additional sources provided no article on the subject."See Here". CBS527^Talk 21:03, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per the above, while it's not particularly biased in the way that it's written there is no real case for notability made. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 01:39, 16 July 2017 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.